<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><?xml-stylesheet title="XSL formatting" type="text/xsl" href="http://blog.kerneis.info/feed/rss2/xslt" ?><rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
  xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
  <title>Mur blanc - Tag - journalisme  - Commentaires</title>
  <link>http://blog.kerneis.info/</link>
  <atom:link href="http://blog.kerneis.info/feed/tag/journalisme/rss2/comments" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
  <description>Notes quotidiennes sur sujets variés, et bribes de connaissance sur tout ce qui me paraît digne d'intérêt. En bref, un fourre-tout qui se targue d'être intéressant. Tout un programme...</description>
  <language>fr</language>
  <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 13:55:39 +0200</pubDate>
  <copyright>Licence CC by-nc-sa 2.0 (version française), sauf mention contraire.</copyright>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Dotclear</generator>
  
    
    
    <item>
    <title>Bullshit of the month - Souffleur de Brume</title>
    <link>http://blog.kerneis.info/post/2006/12/09/Bullshit-of-the-month#c129462</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:md5:85fb2f54a390da27f2e4264fea2d352f</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 03:32:59 +0100</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Souffleur de Brume</dc:creator>
    
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah ! I think it's a shame for this blog to publish this kind of... thing
at all. That's bullshit ;) ! And that's not because the idea is stupid (well,
actualy the idea *is* stupid, but that's not the point), but because the
article is; it says : let's put a symbol on that. Then what ? What do you do
with it ? Math is all about inventing symbols and playing with. Where do we
play in this article ? Wanna play !!!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;PS : I'd say &amp;quot;It works indeed... or not&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;It may work indeed... or it may
not&amp;quot; but not &amp;quot;It works indeed... or maybe not.&amp;quot;, but that's just me ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  </item>
      
    
    <item>
    <title>Bullshit of the month - Rayon de Soleil</title>
    <link>http://blog.kerneis.info/post/2006/12/09/Bullshit-of-the-month#c129052</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:md5:65887724718e031389f7e4ac909406c4</guid>
    <pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 03:18:00 +0100</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Rayon de Soleil</dc:creator>
    
    <description>&lt;p&gt;How can you NOT know that, indeed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It's really super cool to have this number that can mean anything, from
minus infinity to zero, including infinity and any possible number. Unless, of
course, all these functions I'm thinking of stop having nice properties such
as, err, being continuous, for instance. I mean, it's really, really helpful.
Oh yeah - really rocks polars bears.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Actually, I think this number already kind of exists in computers. It's
called NaN (Non available Number).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;NaN stands for Not A Number rather than Non Available Number, but you're
definitely right.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;PS: &amp;quot;English&amp;quot;, capital E. I'd say &amp;quot;You idiot&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;You moron&amp;quot; or even &amp;quot;You
fool&amp;quot; rather than &amp;quot;You stupid&amp;quot;. But it's personal ;-).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;My mistake. Thank you.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  </item>
      
</channel>
</rss>